But what got me about the Lakes is that, initially, I’d expected to test them and eventually go back to the Rimes instead, they were so comfortable, and worked so well, that I’ve used them exclusively all summer. All three are fine trail shoes, and I particularly like the higher inside cuff on the Rimes to protect the ankle. But that’s well in line with comparable shoes like the Giro's Terraduro or Specialized’s Rime Expert, which are each $20 more. The MX 176 isn’t a feathery-light shoe at 405g each. When I initially wrote up the shoes in spring, my testing conditions were cool, and I was curious whether the black uppers and minimal venting would get steamy and hot on summer days. It holds secure, although there’s a bit of heel lift when hiking steeper sections unless you really clamp the dial down. Despite the lack of plastic reinforcement under the main dial, I never got painful hot spots from the closure system, even on longer rides. This white elliptical / oval pill with imprint 176 on it has been identified as. The closure is a single-dial Boa system with a hook-and-loop forefoot strap. Like any other dosage form, it can cause hydrocodone side effects. The nylon sole is stiff enough for most trail riding, and I never felt like it was twisting around the pedal, even on smaller-bodied XC pedals like Time’s ATAC. RELATED: Lake's New Cycling Shoes are Unlike Any We've Ever Seen If you have exceptionally wide feet, take note: Lake makes the MX 176 in an even wider-lasted variant, in a slightly smaller size run. I have a moderately wide, moderate-to-high volume foot and the size 41 in regular width fit me perfectly-but if you have very narrow feet, Lake might not be the right brand for you. Play icon The triangle icon that indicates to play Here's how to set the shock sag on your mountain bike for an even better ride: (Any number of shoe companies have faced delamination issues-it’s a common manufacturing problem.) The synthetic leather upper has minimal panels and stitching aside from some breathable mesh windows, and is scuffed but holding up great, and most importantly still firmly bonded to the sole. After a number of rides with a fair bit of hiking and bushwhacking, the chunky outsole doesn’t show a ton of wear, despite the sticky, softer rubber compound. It’s mostly a shoe for all-around trail riding. The MX 176 is neither an XC-style shoe nor a modern, mid-height “endur-bro” model. RELATED: 6 of our Favorite MTB Shoes for Any Type of Trail The shoes I got appeared to be well-made, they fit properly, the Boa closure system works, and most important: they’ve held up. So I had low expectations.īut after several months of use, the MX 176 has restored my faith in the brand. While Lake has made some excellent shoes in the past, for a couple of years around 2010-ish, there were issues: poor closure designs manufacturing issues like ragged stitching and sloppy glue jobs that would delaminate and spotty availability. I’ll admit that at first, I wasn’t thrilled with the assignment. Last spring, I got a pair of Lake’s MX 176 trail shoes and wrote them up after some initial testing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |